26 |
Separate pooling used to come about under the 1990 Act if the statute deemed a separate trade to be carried on eg each lease otherwise than in the course of the trade of leasing.228 As we have seen, CAA 2001 rejects the paradigm case of trading in favour of the abstract phrase qualifying activity and so this particular example is redesignated as the qualifying activity of special leasing of Plant and Machinery.229 |
Certain short-life assets may be pooled separately if the taxpayer so elects.230 |
Where a first year allowance is taken, T may not also claim a writing down allowance for that first year.231 When the 40% first year allowance was taken, the allowance in the second year is 25% of the 60% of the expenditure remaining. |
No writing down allowance may be claimed for the period during which permanent discontinuance takes place; only a balancing allowance (or charge) is made.232 A balancing adjustment may be made where a non-resident trades through a branch or agency in the UK and the proportion of the total trade represented by the UK branch or agency changes—downwards (ie is reduced).233 |
Where more items come into the pool, the writing down allowance is 25% of the excess of sums spent over sums so far allowed whether under a first year allowance or a writing down allowance plus disposal value. |
24A.2.6.2 Examples |
|
| 24A.2.7 Disposal Value234 |
Disposal value is relevant when a disposal event occurs:235 in the account which follows T is the person who has incurred the qualifying expenditure.236 Disposal events arise when: |